Re: thoughts - opinions
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
There are good reasons on both sides. If the listing
is difficult, do not list on trees.
I have a husband/father who divorced and the former wife (my relative) and
children do have contact with the father. The mother remarried and
the children were adopted by the husband.
I was showing the biological family, but since I found out how
difficult it was to this branch, I made the father "unlinked" and put a
complete explanation in his notes, but no connection to the family.
In this way he never shows up in anything published.
The reason to keep him, is that - he is the biological father and
if there is ever a reason to find their ancestors, the information
and even copies of documents are in my records.
When you start to read readin,
how do you know the fellow that
wrote the readin,
wrote the readin right?
Long Branch Saloon
Dodge City, Kansas
On Tuesday, January 14, 2020, 5:03:23 AM GMT+2, <eagle0017@...> wrote:
I had an aunt who fell down a short flight of stairs during the 8 + month. They rushed her to the hospital for a c section. The baby was dead and my aunt was injured. She couldn't have any children after that. Needless to say she was sad the rest of her of her life at the lost of the child. I would never mention the infant on my tree and it upsets me when a family member has it on their tree as a stillborn. To me it was a tragedy.
NISICHES, ADLER, CZITRONE, KLEIN