25 years ago when I began scanning photos, I named them
picnnn. When I got to 800, I realized I needed something better.
I now scan photos I borrow from people and give each person a code, I am DC.
Digital photos repeat and need a different system. These I rename
duplicates so DSN00002.jpg becomes DSN0002_1.jpg. One person can have
multiple photos with the same name but different folders.
No there is no way for 2 or more people to keep track of all
photos unless they agree on a single system.
Photos with a few people I record the date and the people from left to right.
The documentation is kept in a separate index file.
Photos with many people are scanned and I add a number to each person and
use the number-to-name.
On my own physical photos, I add a number such as P2203 on the back in pencil. After a
few minutes I use a dry rag to wipe over the writing to remove any graphite dust.
There may be something better than graphite, but this seems to work.
To eliminate scanned duplicates I use Linux app findimagedupes. There are also
Windows apps to find duplicates. To find digital duplicates I use md5sum.
I strongly suggest an index file so you can later find all the photos with a person
or photos with 2 or more people. In windows:
find /i "dahn" index.txt |find /i "Ralph"
to find myself and my father.
When you start to read readin,
how do you know the fellow that
wrote the readin,
wrote the readin right?
Long Branch Saloon
Dodge City, Kansas
On Friday, June 12, 2020, 03:00:49 PM GMT+3, Tammy via groups.jewishgen.org <tasu1=aol.com@...> wrote:
What is the best way to source photos? As my cousins and I do photo exchanges, a documented source seems to be the best way to resolve future questions about the contents of the image. I'd like to do this sourcing electronically. Also, how does one do this if the name of the image changes or the location of the image changes? I am constantly re-organizing my file folders.