On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 05:34 PM, E. Randol Schoenberg wrote:
Look, for example, at the tree of the Maharal of Prague. There are still some issues, but we have tried to eliminate much of the apocryphal ancestry that you will find on most other sites, based on recent scholarship.
I have taken a look at the page - thanks.
I can see that there are 115 managers and one curator.
Why is it that under the "sources" tab, no sources are listed? This seems completely at odds with claims you have made on the concurrent thread about Geni trees, (for example, "Aubrey, let me know where I can see a superior genealogical tree to what we have on Geni. Many of us who know much more about genealogy than you do").
It is not my intent to be oppositional. It is simply that the evidence doesn't appear to support your claim.
Thank you, Joyaa