Re: Top 10 Jewish Genealogy Myths - Print Out for the Thanksgiving Dinner Table! #JewishGenUpdates


jbonline1111@...
 

Re myth #7, not only did my maternal grandfather not know his birthdate, he didn't know his age, according to my mother.  Supposedly he lied about his age to get into this country alone, though if his age was given at embarkation, I'm not really sure if that is true.  But the family story is that he traveled with an uncle and was separated at disembarkment, so he lied and said he was older than he was.  Eventually, as he said he was born during Passover, his children gave him a birthday, April 15, many years before that became Tax Day.  

So here we have another reason to lie about one's age/birthday, just needing to be old enough to enter the country alone. 

Barbara Sloan
Conway, SC






On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:31 PM Avraham Groll <agroll@...> wrote:
Top 10 Myths - Print Out for the Thanksgiving Dinner Table!

For those who are in the USA, Thanksgiving will be filled with food, traveling, and expressions of thanks for living in this great country.
It also is marked by relatives sharing "family history" stories
that are just not true.

For anyone who needs help at the dinner table today, we have prepared the top ten myths that people will often hear - and the perfect response to each of them.
Happy Thanksgiving from your Friends at JewishGen - and let us know how dinner goes! 😀

Notes:
(1) To view/print this page from our website, visit: https://www.jewishgen.org/education/mythbusters.htm
(2) We are working to include Sephardic focused myths in an upcoming edition of JewishGen Mythbusters.

-----
Myth #1: Most Ashkenazic family surnames can be traced to BEFORE the 18th century —
RESPONSE: Most Jews did not have fixed hereditary surnames until the early 19th century. Before that, people were known only by their first name and a patronymic, i.e., their father's first name, e.g.: “Yaakov ben Shmuel” (in Hebrew), or “Yaakov Shmulovich” (in Russian), both meaning “Yaakov, the son of Shmuel”.
 
Surname adoption for Jews began to be required by the various governments during the late 18th and early 19th centuries. The Austrian Empire (1787) was the first to require this, and was followed by edicts from the Russian Tzar for the Pale of Settlement (in 1804, and again in 1835 and 1845), and for the Russian Kingdom of Poland (1821). Napoleon inspired France (1808) to take this modern step, which was followed by various German states: Frankfurt (1807), Baden (1809), Westphalia (1812), Prussia (1812), Bavaria (1813), Württemberg (1828), Posen (1833), and Saxony (1834). Jewish surnames were not required in Romania until the 1870s, or in Turkey until 1934.
 
Myth #2: Spelling of surnames is important —
RESPONSE: Spelling is irrelevant in genealogy, as the consistent spelling of names is a 20th-century invention and obsession. Names were almost never spelled in a standard way in earlier records. For example, it is not unusual for the same person's name to be spelled Meyerson, Meirzon, Majersohn, etc. — they're all the same name. Transliteration from one language to another creates infinite spelling variances, e.g., there is no “H” sound in the Russian Cyrillic alphabet, so Jewish names such as “Hersh” might become “Gersh”, utilizing the “G” sound instead.
 
Myth #3: We have the same last name, so we are probably related —
RESPONSE: Just because two people have the same surname, it does not necessarily mean that they are related. Very few Jewish surnames are monogenetic, i.e., having only a single progenitor with that surname. Many Jewish surnames (e.g.: Cohen, Levine, Katz, Kaplan, Weiss, Klein, Feldman, Greenberg, Friedman, Finkelstein, Epstein, most patronymics, etc.) are extremely common, each perhaps having hundreds of separate progenitors. Surnames derived from patronymics and occupations arose independently in towns throughout Eastern Europe, among non-related families. So attempting to undertake genealogy based on surname matches alone is not always productive. Geographic-based matches are often more important than the surname matches.
 
Myth #4: Our family surname changed at Ellis Island —
RESPONSE: No, it was not. Passenger lists were filled out at the port of embarkation by clerks hired by the steamship lines, or by the ship's purser, and then checked by U.S. customs or immigration authorities upon arrival. Thus, the names on these passenger lists are the European, pre-Americanized versions of names. No names were changed at Ellis Island. Immigrants changed their own names afterwards, to more easily recognized surnames, those which might match their already arrived relatives, or the name of someone who sponsored them to come to America, or even a name with perceived greater “yichus” or renown.
 
Myth #5: All of the vital and other family records were destroyed in the Holocaust —
RESPONSE: Yes, some records were destroyed due to wartime conditions, but on the whole, the majority of records have survived and are available in archives throughout Europe and other areas of the Jewish diaspora. Particularly, there are large amounts of records available on JewishGen, as well as through a number of organizations that also have collected and preserved Holocaust-related documents, as well as the large accumulations of records in Israel, and many that are available through commercial entities.
 
Myth #6: Our ancestral town no longer exists —
RESPONSE: Today, your ancestral town may not have a Jewish community which has survived, but it most likely still does exist. It might be in a different country, or have a different name. More than 6,000 known Jewish communities can be searched in the JewishGen Communities Database. Once you have identified your ancestral town and its present-day name, it is possible to locate records, visit the place, and involve yourself in learning more about your ancestors’ lives, with the assistance of JewishGen and its various tools such as Yizkor Books, KehilaLinks, and the like.
 
Myth #7: People knew their birthdates —
RESPONSE: Wrong, many immigrants did not know their birthdates. Entering the U.S. before 1924 required no documentation, just a ticket. Many brought no identification papers with them. Even if they knew their birthdates, it was usually in relation to a Jewish holiday (“the third day of Chanukah”), or a Hebrew date (“12th of Adar”). They had no easy way of translating this Jewish calendar date into the secular Gregorian calendar date. Many individuals decided to use American holidays, such as January 1st or July 4th, as their birthday. Also, some people adjusted their ages for various reasons: to avoid conscription into the military, to be eligible to vote, to enable them to obtain pensions, or to marry a younger person. It is said that the average woman’s age decreased over seven years between every Federal census from 1900 through 1940.
 
Myth #8: Family Stories (“bubbe meises”) are absolutely true —
RESPONSE: While many stories have germs of truth and should be investigated, often the stories are exaggerated. For example, “my great-grandfather was the tailor to the Tsar” (probably he sewed uniforms for the Tsar's army); “my great-grandfather played in the Emperor's band” (perhaps the local band dedicated to the Emperor?); or “my great-grandfather was the chief rabbi of our ancestral town” (many men were ‘qualified’ as rabbis, but in daily life were milkmen, butchers, etc.). There are also bubbe-meises about the black sheep in families, and these too may be tracked down due to the prevalence of available records and knowledge about how to obtain documentation.
 
Myth #9: DNA Analysis is THE way to find out who is in your family —
RESPONSE: DNA analysis can be an incredibly powerful and revolutionary genealogical tool, but it has to work in conjunction with other tools. Jewish DNA also presents a bit of a challenge. Because Jews are descended from a small group of people whose descendants have married one another for generations, autosomal tests often predict that Jews are much more closely related than they actually are. While autosomal predictions will be correct for very close relationships, matches beyond immediate family need to be investigated further -- using techniques including paying attention to the size of the segments. Traditional paper-trail research needs to be done to verify any suspected connection to a traceable common ancestor.
 
Y-DNA tests show if there is a common direct-male ancestor between two males, but because the vast majority of Ashkenazim have only had surnames for a couple of centuries, often there will not be matches with the same surname, as would be the case for most western Europeans. mtDNA looks at the direct female line, but because it mutates so infrequently, often there are hundreds of exact matches, whose common direct female ancestor may have been multiple centuries back, with no existing paper trail. All of these tests can be used to disprove genealogical theories, but they give only one more piece of evidence in proving a specific theory.
 
Myth #10: The United States Census provides the Truth about your American family —
RESPONSE: Sometimes, the census is correct. However, the enumerator came to the door and questioned whomever he found there; be it a child or neighbor (he was paid by the line). It is important to compare multiple years of the census and other key records — such as birth, marriage and death records; passenger manifests; military draft records; naturalization documents, etc. — in order to approach “the truth” about your family, how they came to America, and what they did once they arrived. This part of genealogy research is one of the most rewarding for the information it can provide on your ancestors.
 
That's it! You now have enough information to show who really knows their family history. Just don't forget to print this page before the family gathering!
 
Wishing you all a Happy Thanksgving!
— The JewishGen Team


--
Barbara Sloan
Conway, SC

Join main@groups.jewishgen.org to automatically receive all group messages.