JewishGen.org Discussion Group FAQs
What is the JewishGen.org Discussion Group?
The JewishGen.org Discussion Group unites thousands of Jewish genealogical researchers worldwide as they research their family history, search for relatives, and share information, ideas, methods, tips, techniques, and resources. The JewishGen.org Discussion Group makes it easy, quick, and fun, to connect with others around the world.
Is it Secure?
Yes. JewishGen is using a state of the art platform with the most contemporary security standards. JewishGen will never share member information with third parties.
How is the New JewishGen.org Discussion Group better than the old one?
Our old Discussion List platform was woefully antiquated. Among its many challenges: it was not secure, it required messages to be sent in Plain Text, did not support accented characters or languages other than English, could not display links or images, and had archives that were not mobile-friendly.
This new platform that JewishGen is using is a scalable, and sustainable solution, and allows us to engage with JewishGen members throughout the world. It offers a simple and intuitive interface for both members and moderators, more powerful tools, and more secure archives (which are easily accessible on mobile devices, and which also block out personal email addresses to the public).
I am a JewishGen member, why do I have to create a separate account for the Discussion Group?
As we continue to modernize our platform, we are trying to ensure that everything meets contemporary security standards. In the future, we plan hope to have one single sign-in page.
I like how the current lists work. Will I still be able to send/receive emails of posts (and/or digests)?
Yes. In terms of functionality, the group will operate the same for people who like to participate with email. People can still send a message to an email address (in this case, main@groups.JewishGen.org), and receive a daily digest of postings, or individual emails. In addition, Members can also receive a daily summary of topics, and then choose which topics they would like to read about it. However, in addition to email, there is the additional functionality of being able to read/post messages utilizing our online forum (https://groups.jewishgen.org).
Does this new system require plain-text?
No.
Can I post images, accented characters, different colors/font sizes, non-latin characters?
Yes.
Can I categorize a message? For example, if my message is related to Polish, or Ukraine research, can I indicate as such?
Yes! Our new platform allows members to use “Hashtags.” Messages can then be sorted, and searched, based upon how they are categorized. Another advantage is that members can “mute” any conversations they are not interested in, by simply indicating they are not interested in a particular “hashtag.”
Will all posts be archived?
Yes.
Can I still search though old messages?
Yes. All the messages are accessible and searchable going back to 1998.
What if I have questions or need assistance using the new Group?
Send your questions to: support@JewishGen.org
How do I access the Group’s webpage?
Follow this link: https://groups.jewishgen.org/g/main
So just to be sure - this new group will allow us to post from our mobile phones, includes images, accented characters, and non-latin characters, and does not require plain text?
Correct!
Will there be any ads or annoying pop-ups?
No.
Will the current guidelines change?
Yes. While posts will be moderated to ensure civility, and that there is nothing posted that is inappropriate (or completely unrelated to genealogy), we will be trying to create an online community of people who regulate themselves, much as they do (very successfully) on Jewish Genealogy Portal on Facebook.
What are the new guidelines?
There are just a few simple rules & guidelines to follow, which you can read here:https://groups.jewishgen.org/g/main/guidelines
Thank you in advance for contributing to this amazing online community!
If you have any questions, or suggestions, please email support@JewishGen.org.
Sincerely,
The JewishGen.org Team
Renee Steinig
From what I'm seeing, Samuel's older children (Katie, Morris, Rosie, Fannie) were born in Hungary in the 1870s and early 1880s and the younger ones (Estelle/Esther, Joseph) were born in the US in the mid-1880s. Estelle's records show birth in NY; Joseph's say either NY or Wisconsin. What looks like the right family was in NY for the 1900 and 1905 census (Samuel and Fannie Gluck and children, Houston St., Manhattan). A listing in 1915 -- Samuel and Francis Gluck on Ave A, Manhattan -- also looks promising. So any time spent in Milwaukee or Boston may have been short. I found on JewishData.com the gravestone of a Samuel Gluck who died in 1918 and is buried at Washington Cemetery in Brooklyn. Also at Washington Cemetery, with a very similarly designed gravestone, is Fanny Gluck. Some details from the graves: Samuel Gluck Sini Yo..? ben Yakov Yehuda (See detailed attached.) died 13 Jan 1918, age 73 Fanny Gluck Frieda bat Moshe Zvi died 19 May 1918, age 70 Some details from their death records (viewed on FamilySearch and Ancestry): Samuel Glick Born c1853 Hungary Died 13 Jan 1918 Manhattan Parents: Jacob Glick, Katie Gottfried Note: 317 Ave A Fanny Gluck Born 16 May 1858 Hungary Died 19 May 1918 745 Brook Ave, Bronx Parents: Morris Goldberg, Kate Gross There are several reasons to think that these are the right people... Hebrew names - Names of both are similar to the parents' names ("Sima" and "Frida") that appear on a transcription of "Ester" Gluck and Charles Mittelman's 1910 marriage record. (See FamilySearch.) Addresses - The address noted on Samuel's death record is the same as that of Samuel and Francis Gluck on the 1915 census. And 745 Brook Ave., Bronx -- Fanny's place of death -- was the address of his daughter Fannie Black in Sept. 1918. (See Benjamin Black's WWI draft card.) Bob: - Is it possible that your father was named for Samuel? - You might try calling Washington Cemetery to ask whether Samuel and Fanny are buried near each other and whether any additional information about them appears in the cemetery's records. Renee Bob Gluck <bobgluck1@...> wrote:
I am trying to find information about my great-grandfather, Samuel Gluck (maybe 1947-1929). I have very little. I believe that he was born in Budapest, immigrated to NYC around 1879, and at some point maybe moved to Milwaukee, WI. I believe that he was married to Frances Goldberger. Their children included my grandfather Joseph, Katie (Herz), Morris, Fannie (Black), and Esther (Mittleman). My late father, Joe’s son Stanley, once told me that Sam may have lived in Milwaukee for a few years and eventually moved to the Boston area, but he didn’t really know. Any ideas?
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Searching KESSLER, Brooklyn, NY
#usa
lsragovicz@...
My uncle's wife (my aunt Susan) is a Kessler. Her father was Jack Jacob Louis Kessler born in New York. His dad was Abraham Kessler born in Russia about 1886. If it rings a bell, I will be happy to get you guys in touch
-- Lia Sragovicz
|
||||
|
||||
Baker Rosalie
Looking for descendants of Mates KONIGSBERG, KEHGSBERG, Sara VOGEL, Sara VISMAN #poland #israelHello Rhonda, This is the only way I can figure out how to reply to you. Also I am not familiar with GEDMatch. My maternal grandfather was Fajwel Konigsberg (born 1873). His father was Levi Itzko (born 1839). They were born in and around Tarnogrod. Is your family from that area? Perhaps Gabriel Konigsberg and Levi itzko were brothers or cousins. My great aunt had a daughter named Miriam. The other names are not famiiar to me.
|
||||
|
||||
Re: "His name was changed at Ellis Island"
#names
karen.silver@juno.com
Yes, parents and grandparents lied to their children and grandchildren for a great many reasons. My grandmother who came in 1904 told me she was born in Kiev, that they had their own house and their own cow. And believe me she left a lot out of that story! Many who came as children themselves had no idea what names were used on the manifests or back home. They had no birth certificates. Those who came before 1907 did not have to prove what ship they arrived on or what name was used. Acquaintences and family vouched for them on naturalization papers. Women who gained their citizenship through marriage never needed to know any of this either. One of my great grandmothers even lied about the ages of her twin sons on the manifest so as not to arouse suspicion about the smallness of one of them with the Ellis Island inspectors. Spellings of names on different documents also varied due to the transliteration from the Yiddish to Russian to Polish to English alphabets and gradual evolution of spelling and some of those variations did not follow Soundex patterns. Using "my name was changed at Ellis Island" was an easy excuse that cut off a great many uncomfortable conversations.
Each and every family has a different story and in my 23 years of doing this I can tell you that part of the joy of genealogy is the search for the truth. Sometimes the truth is good and sometimes it is awful, but in the end it is just the truth. Our ancestors were complicated people who did their best to thrive in America and yes, they did lie!
|
||||
|
||||
Looking for Polish woman who jumped off train to Auschwitz
#holocaust
#poland
DALE ZEIDMAN
I am searching for a woman from Lomza, Poland, who was on a train to Auschwitz and jumped off. Did she survive? Did she make it to Israel? What was her name? Thanks for your help. Dale Zeidman New York
|
||||
|
||||
Re: "His name was changed at Ellis Island"
#names
JPmiaou@...
Jules Levin asked:
Do Italian-Americans, Greek-Americans,Oh, yes. In spades. _Everyone_ believes it, totally without regard to specific origins. I've heard the "name changed at Ellis Island" myth from Italians, Hungarians, Jews, Catholics, whites, blacks, and everyone in between. It's enough for a family story to include the phrases "name change" and "Ellis Island" for people to jump straight to the myth. Even if the family story is specifically that the name _wasn't_ changed at Ellis Island, what the genealogical neophyte comes away with is the exact opposite. Confirmation bias, I think it's called. Julia Szent-Györgyi /\ /\ *.*<
|
||||
|
||||
Early 1900s Jewish Family With Their Dog
#general
I recently connected with a 2nd cousin, and she sent me a picture from around 1905 (taken in New York or still in Russia) of her grandfather, his wife, and their first four children. One of the children is holding a dog. Being a dog lover, I was surprised, as I didn't think that at that time it was common for Jewish families, either in Minsk or New York, to have a dog, and especially to put it in a family portrait. I am curious if others have seen this. The family was definitely not affluent. I have a few studio photos of my grandfather, and have been told his outfit was borrowed from the photographer. Could they have borrowed a dog for the photo? I am very curious.
|
||||
|
||||
Re: "His name was changed at Ellis Island"
#names
Sherri Bobish
Hello fellow 'genners, Has a study ever been conducted as to the percentage of immigrants to the U.S. that did, or did not, at some point make the personal choice to alter their surname? None of my four immigrant grandparents, who all came through Ellis Island, changed their surnames. I don't believe that names were changed at the point of immigration. However, some immigrants did choose, at some point in their lives, to alter their surnames to varying degrees. Coming to America meant being able to re-invent oneself. Sometimes part of that personal journey was the voluntary choice of changing the first and/or surname. Regards, Sherri Bobish Princeton, NJ
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Geni and Family Search
#general
Max Heffler
I have found educated guesses, noted as such, to be extremely valuable is breaking through brick walls.
From: main@... [mailto:main@...]
On Behalf Of Jx. Gx. via groups.jewishgen.org
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2020 1:49 PM To: main@... Subject: Re: [JewishGen.org] Geni and Family Search #general
ALWAYS build your family history using primary sources such as census records, birth, marriage, death records, wills, and if your are fortunate to have living relatives interview them. Actually, do the interviews first or at least at the
same time you are doing the paper trail. Remember, your elderly relatives won't be around forever to ask questions. The primary documents aren't perfect, but you can iron out most difference by comparing and contrasting these sources. Only then when you
are on solid ground or in the event you hit brick wall, look at family trees posted by other people. But don't take their postings as fact. I've seen some really careless work. Search out their sources for yourself and apply the same critical analysis that
you use when doing your own research. -- Web sites I manage - Personal home page, Greater Houston Jewish Genealogical Society, Woodside Civic Club, Skala, Ukraine KehilalLink, Joniskelis, Lithuania KehilaLink, and pet volunteer project - Yizkor book project: www.texsys.com/websites.html
|
||||
|
||||
Re: "His name was changed at Ellis Island"
#names
C Chaykin
Amazing. No sooner than the "community" discards the canard that immigration officials changes people's names, another canard that name changes were effected by HIAS officials. Wow. That is even more imaginative and less plausible.
Here's what happened, again and again: immigrants adopted new names, willingly and deliberately. The reasons for doing so varied – some names were in foreign alphabets (e.g. Cyrillic), some name spellings were not pronounced properly in English (e.g., Romanian -vici suffix sounds like "English' -witz), some names were deemed too long to be practical, etc., etc., etc. But no reason was needed to use a new spelling or a new name. And in many (most?) instances, no government official or other representative was required to sanction the name change. Google the history of name changes in the U.S., and that is what you will find. It was also possible to effect a name change at the time of naturalization, but again, this was done willingly and deliberately by the person being naturalized. Were mistakes made, in misspellings, or later imputed to bad handwriting? Sure, but again, I believe these errors did not become "memorialized" unless the immigrant adopted the mistakes or misspellings, willingly and deliberately. BTW HIAS is still around, and available for inquiries. Good luck chasing down this new theory.
|
||||
|
||||
Alexander Sharon
My mother in law Ida was Idalia
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Heitler
#general
JPmiaou@...
Looking for last name Heitler.I have a maternal great-grandmother named Heitler; I've traced her grandfather and great-grandfather to Sikátor in Veszprém county, Hungary in the early 1800s. (They redrew the county lines and it's now in Győr-Moson-Sopron county.) They were Roman Catholic, but the village was majority Lutheran. (The Ottomans depopulated the village in the 1500s and it was re-settled in the early 1700s, mostly from various places in Germany, as far as I can tell.) As you doubtless know, you can't do genealogy based on just surnames. Many people who are completely unrelated can have the same surname, while most of your closest relatives are likely to have a different surname. Julia Szent-Györgyi /\ /\ *.*<
|
||||
|
||||
FAMILIES FRIDMAN AND KAMIENIECKI
#belarus
Lemberski Evelyne
FAMILIES FRIDMAN AND KAMIENIECKI
I I would like to know the members of the family below have a family link with my great grandparents Zelman KAMIENIECKI born in KOBRYN in 1872 and his wife Chaya Khaya Zora Sora Haïa (I do not know her maiden name and I would like to know), my grandfather born on 22/10/1898 in brest litowsk Here is the family: Simon Lazare Schimon FRIDMAN OU FRIEDMAN born in 1870 Chaïa Hinda Haya SAKNOVITZKI SAKHNOVITZKI born in 1872 and their children Jacques FRIEDMAN FRIDMAN born June 4, 1901 in Brest Malka Marcelle FRIEDMAN FRIDMAN born December 10, 1908 in brest Philippe FRIEDMAN FRIDMAN born November 19, 1898 in Brest Léa FRIEDMAN FRIDMAN born in October 1895 in Brest Besides, is there a link with Zelda FRYDMAN FRIEDMANN born in 1899 in Brest Litowsk whose father was Anchel FRYDMAN FRIEDMANN with the above family please? Evelyne LEMBERSKI Saint Maurice (France) evelynelemberski@...
|
||||
|
||||
Malka
Genners,
The Hebrew equivalent for Ida may be Ada (or Adah) which means jewel or adornment. Shalom, Malka Chosnek
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Geni and Family Search
#general
Jx. Gx.
ALWAYS build your family history using primary sources such as census records, birth, marriage, death records, wills, and if your are fortunate to have living relatives interview them. Actually, do the interviews first or at least at the same time you are doing the paper trail. Remember, your elderly relatives won't be around forever to ask questions. The primary documents aren't perfect, but you can iron out most difference by comparing and contrasting these sources. Only then when you are on solid ground or in the event you hit brick wall, look at family trees posted by other people. But don't take their postings as fact. I've seen some really careless work. Search out their sources for yourself and apply the same critical analysis that you use when doing your own research.
Jeffrey Gee Arizona
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Name Changes on Passenger Lists
#general
Ada Glustein
To the best of my understanding, the original passenger lists were drawn up and handwritten by the pursers of the ship. And I agree totally that they wrote down the names as heard by them. In my own family's case, arriving in Canada on a ship that left from Antwerop, Belgium, I found my family's surname was written as "Gluckstein", perhaps a name familiar to the purser, at least moreso than Glustein. The name originally was pronounced "Gluzshtein" (gluz-shteyn). The children's first names also had the same "sound"; you could tell how they got to the name that was written, but not all the names were correct. My own father's name was Israel, whose mother likely called him "S'ruel". On the passenger list, he is marked as "Samuel", similar to what the purser must have heard. Once in Canada, and as far as naturalization went, the spelling was as the family chose in Canada, and as recorded on the census and in the city directories, at first, Glushtein, and in later years, Glustein. It's an evolutionary story!
Ada Glustein, Vancouver, BC. Searching: GLUSTEIN (Kammenaya Krinitsa, Uman, Ukraine), PLETZEL (Ternovka, Ukraine)
|
||||
|
||||
Dr.Josef ASH
Russian has NO sound "H" or Hebrew ה and NO letter for it.
in foreign words Rissian changes it to G (Г) like in Gematoma, Gemoglobin. Sometimes it dissapears (as in hystory - История) in belarussian language Г sounds as fricative sound so it is closer to h and, may be, it is easyer to sign english h or hebrew-yiddish ה (as in הערץ) by belarussian Г. practically, if you know him as Herts (hart in Yiddish), call him Herts.
|
||||
|
||||
There is no real H sound in Russian, and possibly in Byelorussian, as we know it in English/German. What comes close is the sound Kh in Russian (pronounced like the German ch) and represented by the Cyrillic letter X but it is usually not used to represent the English H. Instead the Cyrillic Г – hard G – is used. Thus Herman becomes German (hard G), Harry becomes Gari and Hertz would become Gertz etc.
Interestingly, other Slavonic languages, e.g. Czech, have many words beginning with H where one would find a G sound in Russian. Thus the recent threads on JewishGen re Horodok/Gorodok. In some regions of Russia, i.e. in the south, the local dialect replaces the hard initial Russian G with an H sound. Pop group (groopa) becomes hroopa. G, Kh and H phonetically are produced close by in the mouth. G is a voiced velar plosive. Kh sound is a voiceless velar fricative. H is a voiceless glottal fricative.
Carole Shaw, London UK WOLFSBERGEN, BOSMAN: Holland ZANDGRUNDT (plus variations), SANDGROUND: Warsaw, London and beyond JACOBOVITCH/JACKSON: Staszow, Poland & London KOSKOVITCH/KENTON: Staszow, Poland & London
|
||||
|
||||
Re: "His name was changed at Ellis Island"
#names
Peter Cohen
Thank you, Bob for injecting some sanity...In case it was not obvious, my original post stipulated from the outset that it was not a government official that changed anyone's name. What I am saying is that the stories are too widespread for all of them to be completely without some basis. The only other alternative is a widespread deliberate lie from parents to children. I am attempting to deconstruct the immigrant experience beyond their interaction with actual officials, to find out what might have led to stories of being instructed to use a different name. The example someone posted about being advised to change their name by people at their synagogue is a perfectly plausible example of a voluntary name change. However, it does not address the widespread incidence of stories that include the phrases "he asked my name" and "he wrote down_____". Since there is no evidence that the US government actually gave immigrants any documents to take with them, it was certainly not a government official who "wrote down" the new name.
Someone contacted me implying that it could not have been HIAS because HIAS did not establish an office at Ellis Island until 1905. Checking hias.org, I learned the following: HIAS was established in 1881. "HIAS established a bureau on Ellis Island in 1904 providing translation services, guiding immigrants through medical screenings, arguing before the Boards of Special Inquiry to prevent deportations, and obtaining bonds to guarantee employable status. We lent some the $25 landing fee and sold railroad tickets at reduced rates to those headed for other cities." So, not only was HIAS operating during the entire period of name change stories, beginning in 1904, it seems like they were actually embedded in the immigration process inside the Ellis Island facility (as opposed to meeting people outside the hall, as I had imagined.) IF HIAS people were the ones who were telling immigrants to use a different name, and IF they were actually doing it inside the Great Hall, it is easy to see why an unsophisticated immigrant could mistakenly think that someone with authority was changing their name. Again, these are only theories. I am not planting a stake and insisting this is what happened. Something in writing may yet surface where a volunteer recorded their role in these name changes, but so far, none are known. I think it is well established that no one with government authority changed anyone's name. But to simply fold one's arms and insist that every name change was done at the instigation of the immigrant does not pass the sniff test. Where there's smoke there's fire.
|
||||
|
||||
Sherri Bobish
Hi Bob, I suggest starting your search by locating Samuel on U.S. census records. You can use www.familysearch.org to look at census, and many other databases. I believe I found Sam GLUCK on the 1900 census living in Missouri with wife Fanney, children Rosa and Frank. You will find much more info when you look at the census page through the above site. U.S. federal census are done every ten years (note that 1890 census was mostly destroyed.) Some states did their own census, often in the middle of the decade, i.e. NY State did a 1905, etc. Good luck in your search, Sherri Bobish Princeton, NJ Searching: RATOWSKY / CHAIMSON (Ariogala / Ragola, Lith.)
WALTZMAN / WALZMAN (Ustrzyki Dolne / Istryker, Pol.) LEVY (Tyrawa Woloska, Pol.) LEFFENFELD / LEFENFELD (Daliowa/ Posada Jasliska, Pol.) BOJDA (Tarnobrzeg, Pol.) SOKALSKY / SOLON FINGER(MAN) (Grodek, Bialystok, Pol.) BOBISH / APPEL (Odessa)
|
||||
|