Date   

What’s New at JewishGen? JewishGen News! #JewishGenUpdates

Nancy Siegel
 

What’s new at JewishGen? Don’t miss the April issue of JewishGen News


Stay informed via the program announcements, reports, and project updates. Read about the Orphans of Meisjeshuis, the Vogel family, the Fonds de Moscou, Life on Cheetwood Street, and more.


If you aren’t subscribed to receive a copy of the newsletter by email, you can access it by following this link:


https://mailchi.mp/jewishgen.org/jewishgen-newsletter-march-327948


Enjoy!


--
Nancy Siegel
Director of Communications
JewishGen.org
(San Francisco, California)
nsiegel@...


Re: Immigration via Hoboken? #usa

Janette Silverman
 

The Friederich der grosse landed in the Port of New York on 23 August. It took about 10 days for the sailing. It is unlikely that it returned to Europe and made it back to the U.S. by 12 Sep 1898. If a passenger was traveling steerage, they would have gone through Ellis Island, whether their ship docked at New York or Hoboken. After clearing the various check-ups on Ellis Island, they would have taken the ferry back to either New York or Hoboken. There's a great article from 2014  at http://hmag.com/port-entry-continent/
Janette Silverman
Phoenix, AZ and Salt Lake City, UT

 


Re: Immigration via Hoboken? #usa

Judy Floam
 

I took a Holland-America student ship from Hoboken when I went to Europe in my ‘20s.   The year would have been 1962.

 

Judy Floam

Baltimore, MD

 


Requesting translations from German #germany #translation

phal4gal@...
 

I have a stack of letters between my grandparents in the 30s that I'm trying to get translated. I've attached a few here - any help will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you, 
Edith Goldman


Re: Wrong people on family trees on genealogy sites #general

Odeda Zlotnick
 

 this is why you never copy from someone else! Often these people just seem to want to brag about how many people are in their tree. One person posts unverified data in their tree and 100 others copy these mistakes into their trees and the mistake snowballs. Don't be one of those people.
Precisely.  

We should all try to distinguish between:
  1. "My tree" - the tree which I trust, edit and share  with people whom I choose to share with.
  2. "Public Tree": A tree out there on an internet site.
  3. "Collaborated tree" A tree on which I collaborate only with people trust and those who trust me

We should also realize the the sites offering "Smart Matches" and "Links" are dangling baits for users to cough up and pay subscripion money.  One should never ever accept them blindly. Sometime, they add great info. Sometimes they don't - buyer beware.

I have had even Geni curators merge profiles and mess up the tree I consider my public tree - and I have had them correct the mess when I sent them documentation.

I have had "merge" requests on Geni, that I simply ignore - and I have had disagreements with collaborators, which we agreed to leave as documented comments concerning that person or name.

As noted by Pieter Hoekstra: Some people honestly think and feel that the larger their tree, the better things are. Others value validity.  Those of us who value validity can't fight / or try convince those who believe in "this is a public party and the more the merrier". We can and should tend our garden to the best of our ability - 

And always remember the following comic:
xkcd: Duty Calls
Duty Calls











--
Odeda Zlotnick 
Jerusalem, Israel.


passports for non-naturalized residents london, canada and the usa? #records

arnold friedman
 

i have a morris/maurice/maures/max jacobs/jackson who was born in
poland abt 1851, he was living as a boarder in london in 1871,
married in 1877, went to canada around 1907 and came to the US in
1924, died in 1929.

Do non-citizens residents get something like a government passport
prior to traveling to a new country, and if so, is it called a
passport or some other document, and where might i find it for England
or Canada.

Based on my research so far, i believe that it was unlikely that he
ever became a naturalized citizen of uk, canada or usa

i am trying to figure out what city in poland he came from and/or both
his parents names. I have wedding record from uk gov and the great
synagogue, us boarder crossing, death record, lots of census records
for morris, but nothing that provides fuller information like
naturalization records or possibly passport application (a passport
photo of him would be nice)

So appreciate advice on non citizen resident gov records like might be
available in that timeframe especially in london or toronto canada.

thank you

arnold friedman
redwood city, ca usa

MORRIS/MAURICE/MAURES/MAX JACOBS/JACKSON
with Wife Marianna Green and Father Israel.
I have not identified any siblings for Morris.


Looking for information/documents on Abuliak and Ber families #records #bessarabia #ukraine #romania

Alberto Kremnitzer
 

Dear friends.
I'm looking for any information, birth, marriage, death or other certificate, record or cemetery information on the following ancestors.
Searched by name and cemetery records on Jewishgen with no success.
Any information on how to find information or documents on them will be deeply appreciated:

Isaac(Yitschak) Ber and Lea Ber who lived in Khotin/Hotin c. 1870 to 1930, then Romania, now Ukraine.
Their sons Wolf Ber b. 16 Sept. 1906 and Ionda(Jonda) b. 15 June 1903, both migrated to Brazil 1929/30.

Moricis Abuliac (Abulhk, Abuliak) e Rifca(Rivca) Abuliac.who lived in Briceni c. 1870 to 1930, then Romania, now Moldova.
Their daughter Perl b. 01 Feb. 1918, migrated to Brazil and got married to Wolf Ber.
Thank you.
Alberto Kremnitzer  ID#: 38830
 
 


Re: Free Webinars with Dr Janette Silverman, Eastern European Genealogy expert 5/1 #events

Vivs
 

People seem to be having trouble with understanding the facebook event for some reason, 
https://occgs.com/mtg_event/speakers/bio_silverman.html is an alternative way to register for the event
--
Vivs Laliberte
www.theOCGG.com

Orange County, Calfiornia


Re: NYC Police Reports #records

Sherri Bobish
 

Carl,

If they married in NYC you can use this free search to find her husband's full name:
NYC Marriage License Index 1950-1995
https://stevemorse.org/vital/nymarriages-rec.html

If they married in NYC before 1950 you can try this database on Ancestry, or if you have access to Ancestry just try this one since it covers more years:
NYC Marriage Licenses 1907-1995
https://stevemorse.org/vital/nymarriages-anc.html?range=1

You can also use these databases to see if her husband re-married.

Good luck in your search,

Sherri Bobish


Re: Immigration via Hoboken? #usa

A. E. Jordan
 




-----Original Message-----
From: laurie.budgar@...

I just received my great-granduncle's naturalization records. They indicate he immigrated through the port of Hoboken on 12 Sep 1898 on the ship Frederick der Grosse. I've never heard of immigrating through this port, 




Hoboken NJ is part of the port complex of New York in the eyes of the immigration folks and the passenger lists are in the NYC records. Immigrants would still go through Ellis Island or the Barge office depending on time or processed on the dock when they were traveling in the higher classes of the ship. Ships going to New York and New Jersey all came through the same route called The Narrows and they would stop at the the immigration point for clearances.

Hoboken is on the west side of the Hudson River so the ship made a left coming north on the river instead of turning right to Manhattan or Brooklyn.

The German shipping companies used the docks in Hoboken and Brooklyn for many years and Holland-America Line went to Hoboken till the 1960s. (If you ever see the movie On the Waterfront, that is the Hoboken docks and a Holland America liner from the 1950s is in some of the scenes.)

Allan Jordan
(a maritime historian as well as a genealogist)
New York


Re: Wrong people on family trees on genealogy sites #general

JoAnne Goldberg
 

The "wrong people" issue is a longstanding problem. For me, the value of
sharing information outweighs the downside, so I try to be zen about the
mistakes I so often run across. (Like the guy who seems to believe that
my great-grandfather was age 8 when he had his first child.)

About the unresponsiveness on places like Ancestry: I am guessing some
people test, or upload a tree using a burner email, and never come back
to check messages.

It would be helpful if Ancestry had more sophisticated data validation.
But they are apparently are making enough money without offering too
many bells and whistles, and they only (grudgingly) make enhancements
when they can no longer ignore demand.  MyHeritage has been more useful
for trying to locate connections, but it's still early days for this
industry.

I'm sad to see that people are keeping trees private. I understand the
desire for record integrity, but that can be achieved via a tree that's
maintained offline. We don't own our ancestors' info, and if my public
tree can help someone else with a breakthrough, well, isn't that part of
the reason we do this?

JoAnne
--
JoAnne Goldberg - Menlo Park, California; GEDmatch M131535
BLOCH, SEGAL, FRIDMAN, KAMINSKY, PLOTNIK/KIN -- LIthuania
GOLDSCHMIDT, HAMMERSCHLAG,HEILBRUNN, REIS(S), EDELMUTH, ROTHSCHILD, SPEI(Y)ER -- Hesse, Germany
COHEN, KAMP, HARFF, FLECK, FRÖHLICH, HAUSMANN,  DANIEL  -- Rhineland, Germany

 


Re: Wrong people on family trees on genealogy sites #general

Scott D. Groll
 

Unfortunately, even JewishGen is not immune to this issue. I have had someone go in and hand transcribe a large portion of my tree from the FTJP into their own tree on Ancestry, and then proceed to change things to fit their methodology. This person was not even a blood relative! No amount of pleading with him would make him budge or change anything. :(

Scott Groll
Ventura County, CA


Re: Wrong people on family trees on genealogy sites #general

KAREN SAUNDERS
 

I would like to throw into the mix, the thought/intention that some copying of data from others may be purely that people are hopeful that a new piece of information may lead to somewhere meaningful. Obviously, there should be a caveat on the accuracy and one would hope that if incorrect data becomes apparent that each would communicate such and rectify.
Karen Saunders


On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 10:11, Alan Ehrlich <alan.ehrlich@...> wrote:

Randy wrote: "There is so much misinformation about Geni from people who don’t really use it. The critic Alan Ehrlich, for example, has added just 34 profiles..."

It's my sincere 'hope' that Randy's incorrect statement above is solely because he was misinformed. However, since he so often unflinchingly disses anybody who's critical in any manner about Geni, well I don't know... Anyway, for information, allow me to set the record straight:

Even before Geni's official launch, while Geni still was in beta test mode, I uploaded an initial gedcom file which by then documented circa 3'000 ancestors and relatives... plus further updated that on several occasions during the following year and months. Oh yes, since then my family database gradually grew to include 20'000+ persons... which many of you know first hand as I've always been eager to share with others all the information it contains.


Perhaps 'food-for-thought' on Geni's behalf, rather than reflexively responding 'ad hominem', perhaps offer remedies to the serious short-comings we are pointing out.

Kind regards,
Alan Ehrlich
Geneva, Switzerland


--
Hello. I would like to join to research info about my 4 x g grandfather Abraham ben Gedaliah Tiktin 1764 - 1820. With thx.


Re: Wrong people on family trees on genealogy sites #general

Alan Ehrlich
 

Randy wrote: "There is so much misinformation about Geni from people who don’t really use it. The critic Alan Ehrlich, for example, has added just 34 profiles..."

It's my sincere 'hope' that Randy's incorrect statement above is solely because he was misinformed. However, since he so often unflinchingly disses anybody who's critical in any manner about Geni, well I don't know... Anyway, for information, allow me to set the record straight:

Even before Geni's official launch, while Geni still was in beta test mode, I uploaded an initial gedcom file which by then documented circa 3'000 ancestors and relatives... plus further updated that on several occasions during the following year and months. Oh yes, since then my family database gradually grew to include 20'000+ persons... which many of you know first hand as I've always been eager to share with others all the information it contains.


Perhaps 'food-for-thought' on Geni's behalf, rather than reflexively responding 'ad hominem', perhaps offer remedies to the serious short-comings we are pointing out.

Kind regards,
Alan Ehrlich
Geneva, Switzerland


Re: DNA matches with descendants of enslaved African Americans. #usa #general

Brad Fanta
 

Thank you Deborah, Mike, and Rachel for all of the links and recommendations.  Coming to The Table, Enslaved.org and The Beyond Kin Project all look like a fabulous organizations and resources. You all have given me a good starting point. Where this will take me, I do not know, but the import of this type of research has never been clearer.   

Brad Fanta
Austin, Texas

Researching
Ingwiller, France: HAAS, UHRY 
Wattwiller, France: WEILL
Cernay, France: GENSBURGER
Westphalia (greater Warburg), Germany:  DANNENBAUM, ROSENBAUM, LEWY/LEVI, MEYERFELD, ROTHSCHILD, SIEBENHAUER
Osterberg/Fellheim, Germany: LAUPHEIMER, SCHWAB
Poznan, Poland:  BLY/BLEY, LEWY/LEVY, MARCUS, KOTTWITZ, KAISER
Grudziadz:  BRASH
Jihlava, Czechia:  POKORNY, EPSTEIN, KRASSNY,
Budapest, Hungary: SINGER


Re: Wrong people on family trees on genealogy sites #general

Pieter Hoekstra
 

Jessica, this is why you never copy from someone else! Often these people just seem to want to brag about how many people are in their tree. One person posts unverified data in their tree and 100 others copy these mistakes into their trees and the mistake snowballs. Don't be one of those people.

Don't concern yourself about what someone else has in their tree, just worry about your own. If worried then make your tree private. Do your own research and prove the source of each of your entries.

--
Pieter Hoekstra  <sold@...>
Moss / Moses, De Costa - London and Brighton
Barnett, Da Costa, Lazarus, Joseph, Judah, Solomon - London


Orange County California JGS Meeting on Sunday With Ellen Kowitt talking about Research in Jewish Ukraine #announcements

Michelle Sandler
 

Sunday at 10:00 am PDT the Orange County California Jewish Genealogy
Society is having their next meeting on Zoom. The speaker is Ellen
Kowitt talking about doing Jewish Genealogical Research in the
Ukraine. Registration is required at www.ocjgs.org. Registration is
free to OCJGS members and $5 for non members. All fees can be paid
for at our website www.ocjgs.org.

Michelle Sandler MLS
President OCJGS
Westminster, California


Re: Immigration via Hoboken? #usa

Joel Weintraub
 

I sent a short message to Laurie about the “port” of Hoboken.  Hoboken had docks for the Hamburg-America Line, and perhaps berthed other ships as well.  The port however should be the Port of New York... that is, Ellis Island.  The important part of the message is that the arrival was shown on the naturalization papers to be 1898.  She should check for the ship arrivals page at stevemorse.org to see if it actually did arrive on Sept. 12th, 1898.  Any arrival information before 1905, when immigration authorities had to certify ship arrival information on the Certificate of Arrival during the naturalization process  should be considered suspect.  I suggested to Laurie that she throw away her assumptions about the arrival information, and concentrate on Ellis Island arrivals.  However, if the person came on first or second class, those manifests from 1897 to 1902 are missing from Ellis Island.
Joel Weintraub
Dana Point, CA



Avast logo

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com


--
Joel Weintraub
Dana Point, CA


Re: Wrong people on family trees on genealogy sites #general

Lee Jaffe
 

I  find Geni's accessibility to be two-edged sword, causing potentially more damage than it has benefits.  I've just found someone added 3 half-siblings – no names, no gender, not vital data – to my immediate tree.  It seems that their tree had me and my two brothers as my father's children but didn't have my mother's identity, so Geni registered them as different people.  It's too easy to add the wrong information and much harder to find and correct such mistakes.
--

Lee David Jaffe

Surnames / Towns:  Jaffe / Suchowola, Poland ; Stein (Sztejnsapir) / Bialystok and Rajgrod, Poland ; Joroff (Jaroff, Zarov) / Chernigov, Ukraine ; Schwartz (Schwarzman?, Schwarzstein?) / ? ;  Koshkin / Snovsk, Ukraine ; Rappoport / ? ; Braun / Wizajny, Suwalki, Poland,  Ludwinowski / Wizajny, Suwalki, Poland

 


Re: Wrong people on family trees on genealogy sites #general

Adam Turner
 


It also retains history of changes, which is invaluable for sorting out errors, and ensuring a high level of accuracy.
This is all great as an aspirational goal for Geni curators, but as applied to 98% of actually existing Geni trees, it's risible. The vast majority of Geni users are unaware of/uninterested in how to do cleanup on others' Geni trees, and errors that are theoretically correctable end up persisting on the site forever, getting copied over and over into other people's trees on other sites, etc. While there are certainly a few large, well-manicured Geni trees out there, there is also a gigantic "long tail" of Geni trees (which includes most of the ones I routinely come across via search engines) that receive none of this curatorial attention, and it shows. Saying the equivalent of "stop telling people not to use Geni then, if lots more people use it it will get much more accurate!" comes off as...very wishful thinking at best.

Since kvetching about Geni has been done to death in this forum, I'll instead diss FindAGrave, which has even higher practical barriers to corrections than Geni. As far as I can tell, only the person who has claimed a FindAGrave memorial page can edit it - and there are some users who have claimed hundreds of thousands of them for the purpose of uploading all the photos of the stones they photograph. The part that drives me up the wall is that frequently, these FindAGrave power users contribute their own error-filled "research" to the memorial pages; by "research," I mean they appear to have spent about 5 seconds pasting the results of a search on Ancestry or FamilySearch into the memorial, without doing any double-checking whatsoever to be sure they've correctly matched these records with the grave they photographed. Then when you point out their obvious errors to them, half the time they snippily demand that you provide rigorous citations for your correction before they will apply it!

My point here is that it's very easy for sites reliant on user-generated content to slip into an eye-rolling equilibrium: one where the power users do virtually zero due diligence of their own to propagate very long-lasting errors, and then set the norms that everyone else, not they, 1) are the ones who should be responsible for performing the labor of cleaning up the mess they made; 2) also need to be held to a far higher data quality standard than they themselves used to originally make that mess.

Adam Turner

4001 - 4020 of 662114