JewishGen.org Discussion Group FAQs
What is the JewishGen.org Discussion Group?
The JewishGen.org Discussion Group unites thousands of Jewish genealogical researchers worldwide as they research their family history, search for relatives, and share information, ideas, methods, tips, techniques, and resources. The JewishGen.org Discussion Group makes it easy, quick, and fun, to connect with others around the world.
Is it Secure?
Yes. JewishGen is using a state of the art platform with the most contemporary security standards. JewishGen will never share member information with third parties.
How is the New JewishGen.org Discussion Group better than the old one?
Our old Discussion List platform was woefully antiquated. Among its many challenges: it was not secure, it required messages to be sent in Plain Text, did not support accented characters or languages other than English, could not display links or images, and had archives that were not mobile-friendly.
This new platform that JewishGen is using is a scalable, and sustainable solution, and allows us to engage with JewishGen members throughout the world. It offers a simple and intuitive interface for both members and moderators, more powerful tools, and more secure archives (which are easily accessible on mobile devices, and which also block out personal email addresses to the public).
I am a JewishGen member, why do I have to create a separate account for the Discussion Group?
As we continue to modernize our platform, we are trying to ensure that everything meets contemporary security standards. In the future, we plan hope to have one single sign-in page.
I like how the current lists work. Will I still be able to send/receive emails of posts (and/or digests)?
Yes. In terms of functionality, the group will operate the same for people who like to participate with email. People can still send a message to an email address (in this case, main@groups.JewishGen.org), and receive a daily digest of postings, or individual emails. In addition, Members can also receive a daily summary of topics, and then choose which topics they would like to read about it. However, in addition to email, there is the additional functionality of being able to read/post messages utilizing our online forum (https://groups.jewishgen.org).
Does this new system require plain-text?
No.
Can I post images, accented characters, different colors/font sizes, non-latin characters?
Yes.
Can I categorize a message? For example, if my message is related to Polish, or Ukraine research, can I indicate as such?
Yes! Our new platform allows members to use “Hashtags.” Messages can then be sorted, and searched, based upon how they are categorized. Another advantage is that members can “mute” any conversations they are not interested in, by simply indicating they are not interested in a particular “hashtag.”
Will all posts be archived?
Yes.
Can I still search though old messages?
Yes. All the messages are accessible and searchable going back to 1998.
What if I have questions or need assistance using the new Group?
Send your questions to: support@JewishGen.org
How do I access the Group’s webpage?
Follow this link: https://groups.jewishgen.org/g/main
So just to be sure - this new group will allow us to post from our mobile phones, includes images, accented characters, and non-latin characters, and does not require plain text?
Correct!
Will there be any ads or annoying pop-ups?
No.
Will the current guidelines change?
Yes. While posts will be moderated to ensure civility, and that there is nothing posted that is inappropriate (or completely unrelated to genealogy), we will be trying to create an online community of people who regulate themselves, much as they do (very successfully) on Jewish Genealogy Portal on Facebook.
What are the new guidelines?
There are just a few simple rules & guidelines to follow, which you can read here:https://groups.jewishgen.org/g/main/guidelines
Thank you in advance for contributing to this amazing online community!
If you have any questions, or suggestions, please email support@JewishGen.org.
Sincerely,
The JewishGen.org Team
Steven Lasky <steve725@...>
Greetings all,
I have some new material on my site of interest to those with an interest in Lodz. I have begun to install web pages into my "Holocaust Memorials" exhibition and the first two have to do with the Lodz memorials at New Montefiore Cemetery in Pinelawn, New York. There are two society burial plots associated with the Lodzer Young Men's Benevolent Society there and both have memorials. Visit the exhibition and you will see photographs of the two monuments and a complete listing of all the names inscribed on each, presumably the names of those >from Lodz who perished in the Shoah. You can access the exhibition through my main Lodz page at www.museumoffamilyhistory.com/lee-lodz.htm . I hope that you find your visit to these pages worthwhile. Also recall that on my site there is a fairly complete listing of all those who last resided in Lodz and immigrated through Ellis Island ("How Our Families Came to America..."). I am also looking to add photographs >from Lodz to both my main Lodz page (modern-day photographs of the city of Lodz) and also to my "Postcards >from Home" exhibition, i.e. family photos taken anytime before the end of WWII. If you have any that I could display, I would be most appreciative. Best regards, Steven Lasky www.museumoffamilyhistory.com
|
|
Steven Lasky <steve725@...>
Greetings all,
I have some new material on my site of interest to those with an interest in Lodz. I have begun to install web pages into my "Holocaust Memorials" exhibition and the first two have to do with the Lodz memorials at New Montefiore Cemetery in Pinelawn, New York. There are two society burial plots associated with the Lodzer Young Men's Benevolent Society there and both have memorials. Visit the exhibition and you will see photographs of the two monuments and a complete listing of all the names inscribed on each, presumably the names of those >from Lodz who perished in the Shoah. You can access the exhibition through my main Lodz page at www.museumoffamilyhistory.com/lee-lodz.htm . I hope that you find your visit to these pages worthwhile. Also recall that on my site there is a fairly complete listing of all those who last resided in Lodz and immigrated through Ellis Island ("How Our Families Came to America..."). I am also looking to add photographs >from Lodz to both my main Lodz page (modern-day photographs of the city of Lodz) and also to my "Postcards >from Home" exhibition, i.e. family photos taken anytime before the end of WWII. If you have any that I could display, I would be most appreciative. Best regards, Steven Lasky www.museumoffamilyhistory.com
|
|
ancestors from Vydybor
#general
Даниил Маргулис <demarg@...>
Hello!
Does anyone have ancestors >from the town Vydybor, Potiyevka district, Zhitomir region? Daniil Yevgenievitch Margulis, Moscow, Russia
|
|
JewishGen Discussion Group #JewishGen ancestors from Vydybor
#general
Даниил Маргулис <demarg@...>
Hello!
Does anyone have ancestors >from the town Vydybor, Potiyevka district, Zhitomir region? Daniil Yevgenievitch Margulis, Moscow, Russia
|
|
"Correct" way to enter main name in a tree
#general
Carolyn Lea <clea@...>
While I know that it may be a matter of personal preference, I am also
certain there is a "correct" way to enter names in the family tree. I have read many posts on name changes, etc, in the archives but did not find a real answer to this. I know that women are to be entered using their maiden name and many software programs warn against entering nicknames - suggesting placing such names in the "alternate names" section instead. I realize that I have been somewhat inconsistent. If a surname is changed (legally or otherwise) should the birth name be the main entry and other names be listed in the alternate section? This seems the correct thing to do - however, then the name which the person may not primarily be known by will not appear in the name index. Also, if the name was changed prior to the birth of a child it may not appear the child is the biological child of the father. The same is true of course going backwards if the alternate name is the main entry. Is it appropriate to place the changed name in parenthesis next to the birth name? Just in my immediate family my father, Leon Schwarzbaum, began using his stepfather's name, Mitchell abt age 10. I was born with that name. I legally changed my name and my son's (he was abt 8) to my middle name (Lea) after my divorce and when I was angry with my father! I have also located a birth certificate for Esther Schwarzbaum who apparently always used Elsie. Her sons (both in their 80s), with whom I am in contact, never knew her name was Esther. I thought I had found a new child! Her marriage and death certificates say Elsie. I believe to be consistent (and what I assume is the "proper format") I should always enter birth name if known. However, I am afraid of name confusion when I share the tree with others. Carolyn Lea Ohio Researching: SCHWARZBAUM/SCHWARTZBAUM > Posen>New York and Savannah, Georgia ROTHSCHILD/ROTHCHILD> Prussia> Darien and Savannah, Georgia BASCH>Prussia>Savannah, Georgia LEVISON> Prussia> Brunswick and Savannah, Georgia OPPENHEIM > Savannah, Georgia WEINBERG > Georgia
|
|
JewishGen Discussion Group #JewishGen "Correct" way to enter main name in a tree
#general
Carolyn Lea <clea@...>
While I know that it may be a matter of personal preference, I am also
certain there is a "correct" way to enter names in the family tree. I have read many posts on name changes, etc, in the archives but did not find a real answer to this. I know that women are to be entered using their maiden name and many software programs warn against entering nicknames - suggesting placing such names in the "alternate names" section instead. I realize that I have been somewhat inconsistent. If a surname is changed (legally or otherwise) should the birth name be the main entry and other names be listed in the alternate section? This seems the correct thing to do - however, then the name which the person may not primarily be known by will not appear in the name index. Also, if the name was changed prior to the birth of a child it may not appear the child is the biological child of the father. The same is true of course going backwards if the alternate name is the main entry. Is it appropriate to place the changed name in parenthesis next to the birth name? Just in my immediate family my father, Leon Schwarzbaum, began using his stepfather's name, Mitchell abt age 10. I was born with that name. I legally changed my name and my son's (he was abt 8) to my middle name (Lea) after my divorce and when I was angry with my father! I have also located a birth certificate for Esther Schwarzbaum who apparently always used Elsie. Her sons (both in their 80s), with whom I am in contact, never knew her name was Esther. I thought I had found a new child! Her marriage and death certificates say Elsie. I believe to be consistent (and what I assume is the "proper format") I should always enter birth name if known. However, I am afraid of name confusion when I share the tree with others. Carolyn Lea Ohio Researching: SCHWARZBAUM/SCHWARTZBAUM > Posen>New York and Savannah, Georgia ROTHSCHILD/ROTHCHILD> Prussia> Darien and Savannah, Georgia BASCH>Prussia>Savannah, Georgia LEVISON> Prussia> Brunswick and Savannah, Georgia OPPENHEIM > Savannah, Georgia WEINBERG > Georgia
|
|
Re: How to Research a 1905 Address
#general
RENEEP8546@...
Sabra Waldfogel" asked
I'm looking for assistance in researching a Manhattan building addresscirca 1905 (27 Pitt Street on the Lower East Side) > The area that would have comprised 27 Pitt street is now listed as 132 Broome and is obviously a modern building and not residential. It was built in 1972 and I think it is now a fire department. Have you tried the New York Public Library online that has some photos of buildings,etc? The address is www.nypl.org Cordially, Renee Payne Washington, DC Searching Benhaim,Serfaty,Abecassis Marrakech Jakobowitz Sanok Weiss Ungvar
|
|
JewishGen Discussion Group #JewishGen Re:How to Research a 1905 Address
#general
RENEEP8546@...
Sabra Waldfogel" asked
I'm looking for assistance in researching a Manhattan building addresscirca 1905 (27 Pitt Street on the Lower East Side) > The area that would have comprised 27 Pitt street is now listed as 132 Broome and is obviously a modern building and not residential. It was built in 1972 and I think it is now a fire department. Have you tried the New York Public Library online that has some photos of buildings,etc? The address is www.nypl.org Cordially, Renee Payne Washington, DC Searching Benhaim,Serfaty,Abecassis Marrakech Jakobowitz Sanok Weiss Ungvar
|
|
Lodz Area research group (LARG) at the IAJGS Conference this summer
#general
Roni S. Liebowitz
If you are planning to attend the 26th IAJGS International Conference on
Jewish Genealogy in New York August 13-18, 2006 and have roots in the Lodz, Poland area, please join us at the Lodz Area Research Group (LARG) annual meeting. See the website (listed below) for a list of the towns included in this area. Click here to let us know you will be attending and the names you are researching. http://www.shtetlinks.jewishgen.org/Lodz/signup.htm You will also see who else plans to be there. As soon as we have a definite time, it will be posted. If you plan to have a Birds of a Feather meeting for a town within LARG, I can add that to the site with your contact information. So far, I am planning one for Belchatow, Poland. Please let me know if you plan to attend that as well. Hope to see you this summer. Roni IAJGS Conference Registration Chair http://www.jgsny2006.org/ [Mrs. Roni Seibel Liebowitz] Scarsdale, New York Lodz Area Research Group (LARG) http://www.shtetlinks.jewishgen.org/Lodz/LARG.htm Lodz ShtetLinks http://www.shtetlinks.jewishgen.org/Lodz/index.htm Belchatow ShtetLink http://www.shtetlinks.jewishgen.org/belchatow/
|
|
JewishGen Discussion Group #JewishGen Lodz Area research group (LARG) at the IAJGS Conference this summer
#general
Roni S. Liebowitz
If you are planning to attend the 26th IAJGS International Conference on
Jewish Genealogy in New York August 13-18, 2006 and have roots in the Lodz, Poland area, please join us at the Lodz Area Research Group (LARG) annual meeting. See the website (listed below) for a list of the towns included in this area. Click here to let us know you will be attending and the names you are researching. http://www.shtetlinks.jewishgen.org/Lodz/signup.htm You will also see who else plans to be there. As soon as we have a definite time, it will be posted. If you plan to have a Birds of a Feather meeting for a town within LARG, I can add that to the site with your contact information. So far, I am planning one for Belchatow, Poland. Please let me know if you plan to attend that as well. Hope to see you this summer. Roni IAJGS Conference Registration Chair http://www.jgsny2006.org/ [Mrs. Roni Seibel Liebowitz] Scarsdale, New York Lodz Area Research Group (LARG) http://www.shtetlinks.jewishgen.org/Lodz/LARG.htm Lodz ShtetLinks http://www.shtetlinks.jewishgen.org/Lodz/index.htm Belchatow ShtetLink http://www.shtetlinks.jewishgen.org/belchatow/
|
|
researching pallaga
#hungary
mary pallaga <mary_pallaga@...>
hello again , i have some more information to add to my ongoing search for
my father GYULA PALLAGA born in PUSPOKLADANY HUNGARY September 6 1926. He left Naples Italy on board a ship called NELLY and came to Australia 1950. he worked on the Snowy River Scheme for some years. my parents were divorced while we were quite young and we have had no contact >from him. Idont know if he went back to hungary or not, i believe his religion was roman catholic. Ido not know anything of my hungarian grandparents. i have located 38 PALLAGA surnames in hungary but they seem to be a long distance >from Puspokladany, so i do not know if they might be related to me. there is a g pallaga listed in telephone book for budapest. if there are any other PALLAGA surnames in hungary wishing to get in contact i would greatly appreciate it. thank you marianne pallaga
|
|
Hungary SIG #Hungary researching pallaga
#hungary
mary pallaga <mary_pallaga@...>
hello again , i have some more information to add to my ongoing search for
my father GYULA PALLAGA born in PUSPOKLADANY HUNGARY September 6 1926. He left Naples Italy on board a ship called NELLY and came to Australia 1950. he worked on the Snowy River Scheme for some years. my parents were divorced while we were quite young and we have had no contact >from him. Idont know if he went back to hungary or not, i believe his religion was roman catholic. Ido not know anything of my hungarian grandparents. i have located 38 PALLAGA surnames in hungary but they seem to be a long distance >from Puspokladany, so i do not know if they might be related to me. there is a g pallaga listed in telephone book for budapest. if there are any other PALLAGA surnames in hungary wishing to get in contact i would greatly appreciate it. thank you marianne pallaga
|
|
Re: Yorkville - Kirsch
#hungary
jps
Ethel,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I read your posting with interest as I also have some Kirsch's in my tree >from the Bronx. The two first names (Annie and Rose) are even matches. Unfortunatly I have no information newer than the 1930 census. Solomon Kirsch b Abt March 1863 - Russia? married about 1887 - Lena Przeworski b Abt 1868 - Austria/Hungary/Galicia? - They had : Joe Kirsch - b Abt 1888 Rose Kirsch - b Abt 1892 Annie Kirsch - b Abt 1907 Also possibly a Muriel - but that may have been the same person as Annie as I haven't found her on any of the census Rose was a Bookkeeper - per 1910 and 1930 census' Solomon and Joe worked in a Grocery per 1910 census' Annie was a Stenographer in 1930 Anyway, here's hoping there is a connection of some sort. John Segedy
|
|
Hungary SIG #Hungary Re: Yorkville - Kirsch
#hungary
jps
Ethel,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I read your posting with interest as I also have some Kirsch's in my tree >from the Bronx. The two first names (Annie and Rose) are even matches. Unfortunatly I have no information newer than the 1930 census. Solomon Kirsch b Abt March 1863 - Russia? married about 1887 - Lena Przeworski b Abt 1868 - Austria/Hungary/Galicia? - They had : Joe Kirsch - b Abt 1888 Rose Kirsch - b Abt 1892 Annie Kirsch - b Abt 1907 Also possibly a Muriel - but that may have been the same person as Annie as I haven't found her on any of the census Rose was a Bookkeeper - per 1910 and 1930 census' Solomon and Joe worked in a Grocery per 1910 census' Annie was a Stenographer in 1930 Anyway, here's hoping there is a connection of some sort. John Segedy
|
|
CZINNER/ZINNER and CZIN?
#hungary
Marian Brown
Dear all,
My great grandfather has the surname CZINNER/ZINNER in most Slovakian records but on one the surname is CZIN. I'm fairly sure it is the same person because of his occupation as a glazier. Would someone know whether it would be likely to have a shortened the name like this? TX, Marian Brown
|
|
Hungary SIG #Hungary CZINNER/ZINNER and CZIN?
#hungary
Marian Brown
Dear all,
My great grandfather has the surname CZINNER/ZINNER in most Slovakian records but on one the surname is CZIN. I'm fairly sure it is the same person because of his occupation as a glazier. Would someone know whether it would be likely to have a shortened the name like this? TX, Marian Brown
|
|
Re: Romocsahaza
#hungary
marvdav@...
How might I access a copy of the Hungaarian Gazatteer mentioned.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks for your help. Marvin Davis
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Neu <roneu1@yahoo.com> To: H-SIG <h-sig@lyris.jewishgen.org> Sent: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:45:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [h-sig] Romocsahaza According to the Hungaarian Gazatteer, in 1877 there were 6 Jews in Romocshaza. The records for this town were with the BILKE community then in Bereg County now in the Ukraine as Bilki. Like for most records >from the Ukraine they are not, so far, available >from the FHL Robert <snip>
|
|
Hungary SIG #Hungary Re: Romocsahaza
#hungary
marvdav@...
How might I access a copy of the Hungaarian Gazatteer mentioned.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks for your help. Marvin Davis
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Neu <roneu1@yahoo.com> To: H-SIG <h-sig@lyris.jewishgen.org> Sent: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:45:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [h-sig] Romocsahaza According to the Hungaarian Gazatteer, in 1877 there were 6 Jews in Romocshaza. The records for this town were with the BILKE community then in Bereg County now in the Ukraine as Bilki. Like for most records >from the Ukraine they are not, so far, available >from the FHL Robert <snip>
|
|
Kunagota Cemetery
#hungary
John J Kovacs <j.kovacs@...>
In response to my inquiry, the MAZSIHISZ, the
Hungarian Jewish Religious Community Alliance, has informed me that they do not wish to to discontinue the Jewish cemetery in Kunagota. It is against our religious traditions to discontinue our cemeteries. The Alliance has also provided me with a copy of their letter to the office of the Kunagota mayors's office stating the foregoing. The Kunagota cemetery of 1122 m2 is the property of the MAZSIHISZ and they request the mayor's office that the cemetery be put in good condition and request an estimate for the expenses. John (Janos) Kovacs
|
|
Hungary SIG #Hungary Kunagota Cemetery
#hungary
John J Kovacs <j.kovacs@...>
In response to my inquiry, the MAZSIHISZ, the
Hungarian Jewish Religious Community Alliance, has informed me that they do not wish to to discontinue the Jewish cemetery in Kunagota. It is against our religious traditions to discontinue our cemeteries. The Alliance has also provided me with a copy of their letter to the office of the Kunagota mayors's office stating the foregoing. The Kunagota cemetery of 1122 m2 is the property of the MAZSIHISZ and they request the mayor's office that the cemetery be put in good condition and request an estimate for the expenses. John (Janos) Kovacs
|
|