|
Ship records
#general
Were they all >from the same home town? I have run into quite a few de facto landsmen residences. For example, it seems that around that time there were a few blocks in E. Houston St. which required a
Were they all >from the same home town? I have run into quite a few de facto landsmen residences. For example, it seems that around that time there were a few blocks in E. Houston St. which required a
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #213375
·
|
|
JewishGen Discussion Group #JewishGen RE: Ship records
#general
Were they all >from the same home town? I have run into quite a few de facto landsmen residences. For example, it seems that around that time there were a few blocks in E. Houston St. which required a
Were they all >from the same home town? I have run into quite a few de facto landsmen residences. For example, it seems that around that time there were a few blocks in E. Houston St. which required a
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #533688
·
|
|
Kings County Court Naturalization Records Before 1907
#general
My great-great-uncle was naturalized in the Kings County Court in 1892. I know how to order naturalization records for that court starting >from 1907, but how do I order a record >from 1892? TIA, Mero
My great-great-uncle was naturalized in the Kings County Court in 1892. I know how to order naturalization records for that court starting >from 1907, but how do I order a record >from 1892? TIA, Mero
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #213389
·
|
|
JewishGen Discussion Group #JewishGen Kings County Court Naturalization Records Before 1907
#general
My great-great-uncle was naturalized in the Kings County Court in 1892. I know how to order naturalization records for that court starting >from 1907, but how do I order a record >from 1892? TIA, Mero
My great-great-uncle was naturalized in the Kings County Court in 1892. I know how to order naturalization records for that court starting >from 1907, but how do I order a record >from 1892? TIA, Mero
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #533702
·
|
|
Searching for documents - Patent Applications
#general
As some of you may recall, I was whining in this forum several months ago regarding the dearth of vital records available on line for Buchach (nee Buczacz). Well, while looking up some of the members
As some of you may recall, I was whining in this forum several months ago regarding the dearth of vital records available on line for Buchach (nee Buczacz). Well, while looking up some of the members
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #213445
·
|
|
JewishGen Discussion Group #JewishGen RE: Searching for documents - Patent Applications
#general
As some of you may recall, I was whining in this forum several months ago regarding the dearth of vital records available on line for Buchach (nee Buczacz). Well, while looking up some of the members
As some of you may recall, I was whining in this forum several months ago regarding the dearth of vital records available on line for Buchach (nee Buczacz). Well, while looking up some of the members
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #533758
·
|
|
First Came "Retroactive Samification" and Now Comes...
#general
A while back, I wrote a positing here about the insidious, pernicious phenomenon of "Retroactive Samification" - meaning that some ancestor who never stepped foot out of his native shtetl had his name
A while back, I wrote a positing here about the insidious, pernicious phenomenon of "Retroactive Samification" - meaning that some ancestor who never stepped foot out of his native shtetl had his name
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #213446
·
|
|
JewishGen Discussion Group #JewishGen First Came "Retroactive Samification" and Now Comes...
#general
A while back, I wrote a positing here about the insidious, pernicious phenomenon of "Retroactive Samification" - meaning that some ancestor who never stepped foot out of his native shtetl had his name
A while back, I wrote a positing here about the insidious, pernicious phenomenon of "Retroactive Samification" - meaning that some ancestor who never stepped foot out of his native shtetl had his name
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #533759
·
|
|
Stumped - Harry NATHAN and family 1915
#general
A couple of ideas: 1) They could have all died. 1915 was before the days of antibiotics. I have seen a small number of incidents in which an entire family died of illness in a relatively short period
A couple of ideas: 1) They could have all died. 1915 was before the days of antibiotics. I have seen a small number of incidents in which an entire family died of illness in a relatively short period
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #214308
·
|
|
JewishGen Discussion Group #JewishGen RE: Stumped - Harry NATHAN and family 1915
#general
A couple of ideas: 1) They could have all died. 1915 was before the days of antibiotics. I have seen a small number of incidents in which an entire family died of illness in a relatively short period
A couple of ideas: 1) They could have all died. 1915 was before the days of antibiotics. I have seen a small number of incidents in which an entire family died of illness in a relatively short period
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #534621
·
|
|
Hebrew Infant Home Bronx, New York
#general
Hi Jackie, The Hebrew Infant Home was indeed an orphanage. However, many of the children had living parents who didn't have the money to raise them or had some personal problem which prevented them >f
Hi Jackie, The Hebrew Infant Home was indeed an orphanage. However, many of the children had living parents who didn't have the money to raise them or had some personal problem which prevented them >f
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #214346
·
|
|
JewishGen Discussion Group #JewishGen RE: Hebrew Infant Home Bronx, New York
#general
Hi Jackie, The Hebrew Infant Home was indeed an orphanage. However, many of the children had living parents who didn't have the money to raise them or had some personal problem which prevented them >f
Hi Jackie, The Hebrew Infant Home was indeed an orphanage. However, many of the children had living parents who didn't have the money to raise them or had some personal problem which prevented them >f
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #534659
·
|
|
include or not?
#general
Hi Trudy, For me, the general rule is to include all blood relatives, their spouses/partners, and their legally adopted children. You are a full relative to all of Yankel Leib and Rachel Leah's common
Hi Trudy, For me, the general rule is to include all blood relatives, their spouses/partners, and their legally adopted children. You are a full relative to all of Yankel Leib and Rachel Leah's common
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #214513
·
|
|
JewishGen Discussion Group #JewishGen RE: include or not?
#general
Hi Trudy, For me, the general rule is to include all blood relatives, their spouses/partners, and their legally adopted children. You are a full relative to all of Yankel Leib and Rachel Leah's common
Hi Trudy, For me, the general rule is to include all blood relatives, their spouses/partners, and their legally adopted children. You are a full relative to all of Yankel Leib and Rachel Leah's common
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #534826
·
|
|
Ellis Island ship's manifest
#general
Your best bet would be to find his naturalization records. If he lived in New York, the 1915 and 1925 NY State Census usually stated year of naturalization and by which court. I believe that by the mi
Your best bet would be to find his naturalization records. If he lived in New York, the 1915 and 1925 NY State Census usually stated year of naturalization and by which court. I believe that by the mi
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #214920
·
|
|
JewishGen Discussion Group #JewishGen RE: Ellis Island ship's manifest
#general
Your best bet would be to find his naturalization records. If he lived in New York, the 1915 and 1925 NY State Census usually stated year of naturalization and by which court. I believe that by the mi
Your best bet would be to find his naturalization records. If he lived in New York, the 1915 and 1925 NY State Census usually stated year of naturalization and by which court. I believe that by the mi
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #535233
·
|
|
1870 US Federal Census - Manhattan
#general
Hi All, I understand that there are some peculiarities with the 1870 Census for Manhattan. First of all, I believe it was performed twice, as the first attempt was deemed unsatisfactory. Second, it ap
Hi All, I understand that there are some peculiarities with the 1870 Census for Manhattan. First of all, I believe it was performed twice, as the first attempt was deemed unsatisfactory. Second, it ap
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #215093
·
|
|
JewishGen Discussion Group #JewishGen 1870 US Federal Census - Manhattan
#general
Hi All, I understand that there are some peculiarities with the 1870 Census for Manhattan. First of all, I believe it was performed twice, as the first attempt was deemed unsatisfactory. Second, it ap
Hi All, I understand that there are some peculiarities with the 1870 Census for Manhattan. First of all, I believe it was performed twice, as the first attempt was deemed unsatisfactory. Second, it ap
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #535406
·
|
|
1870 US Federal Census - Manhattan - SOLVED
#general
Dear All, I wish to thank all who wrote me offline with helpful suggestions, but would particularly like to thank Sherri Bobish and Yehudah Ben Shlomo, each of whom found my great-grandfather and his
Dear All, I wish to thank all who wrote me offline with helpful suggestions, but would particularly like to thank Sherri Bobish and Yehudah Ben Shlomo, each of whom found my great-grandfather and his
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #215185
·
|
|
JewishGen Discussion Group #JewishGen RE: 1870 US Federal Census - Manhattan - SOLVED
#general
Dear All, I wish to thank all who wrote me offline with helpful suggestions, but would particularly like to thank Sherri Bobish and Yehudah Ben Shlomo, each of whom found my great-grandfather and his
Dear All, I wish to thank all who wrote me offline with helpful suggestions, but would particularly like to thank Sherri Bobish and Yehudah Ben Shlomo, each of whom found my great-grandfather and his
|
By
Meron Lavie
· #535498
·
|