Date
1 - 5 of 5
New records online: the New York City *Geographic* Birth Index, late 19th and early 20th century, from Reclaim The Records
Asparagirl
Hello again from Reclaim The Records!
We've just released the first-ever online copy of the New York City *Geographic* Birth Index. It's a new tool to help find people born in New York City in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, especially if their birth records had spelling variants or poor handwriting. This record set is an index to all births in New York City from roughly 1880-1912 (or 1917-ish in some cases outside of Manhattan). But unlike a typical birth index arranged by surname or by date, this one is arranged by the child's place of birth, the actual exact street address. We think there's about 2.8 million names in here, maybe more, in over half a million images. They've never been available outside of New York City before. And now they're all online, and all free! Read all about it in our latest newsletter: https://mailchi.mp/reclaimtherecords/introducing-the-new-york-city-geographic-birth-index But you can also jump right to the records themselves, which are available online at the Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/nycgeobirthindex (Note that you can even download some or all of the half a million images from the Internet Archive, if you really want -- although the .zip files are pretty big!) And the records are also online at FamilySearch: https://www.familysearch.org/search/catalog/3023263?availability=Family%20History%20Library And that's because FamilySearch generously donated the microfilm scanning work for us again -- thank you, FamilySearch! So if you already know the address of a New York City family from another source, such as a census record (US Federal Census, New York State Census, or the 1890 New York City "Police Census") or a city directory or a vital record, go check that same address through the years to see if any other kids with a similar surname were born at that address, too. You might find some previously-unknown births where the names might have been misspelled or mistranscribed in the "regular" New York City birth index. Check out our newsletter, linked above, to see an example of what we mean. Reclaim The Records is a 501(c)3 non-profit, independent from JewishGen, but we appreciate their letting us use this lovely new discussion group to mention some of our ongoing activities. ;-) To learn more about Reclaim The Records, and the kinds of work we do to acquire new historical records and put them online for free public use -- sometimes with the help of Freedom of Information lawsuits that we file against government agencies, archives, and libraries -- please check out our website: https://www.ReclaimTheRecords.org/ Special shout-out to Jewish/NYC genealogist Jordan Auslander, who first alerted us to the existence of the microfilm records at the New York City Municipal Archives -- at an IAJGS conference session he presented a few years ago. - Brooke Schreier Ganz Mill Valley, California President and Founder, Reclaim The Records https://www.ReclaimTheRecords.org/
|
|
e l
Hello Brooke,
As a retired attorney who spent much of his career working with tax exempt organizations, I would like to point out the the correct citation is §501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. That designation was put in place in or a bit after 1918 and remains the same to this day except that the date of the Code has been revised whenever there has been a major revision. That designation was certainly used in the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. Sincerely, Edward David Luft
|
|
Manhattan 1910-1914 only has "a" which only goes through 425 East Broadway (of course I need Norfolk St.) - will the rest of Manhattan 1910-1914 be added?
|
|
Asparagirl
Judy writes:
"Manhattan 1910-1914 only has "a" which only goes through 425 East Broadway (of course I need Norfolk St.) - will the rest of Manhattan 1910-1914 be added?" Hi Judy, Reclaim The Records has acquired, digitized, and posted online every microfilm of the New York City Geographic Birth Index that the New York City Municipal Archives currently has in their possession -- that's 96 microfilms. But as you've noticed, the records unceremoniously cut off in the early twentieth century, in different years depending on the Borough (county). There are many other films of this Geographic Birth Index, which supposedly go up through the 1940's or possibly the early 1950's. We believe they are still in the possession of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, and were not turned over to the Archives. But as far as we know, the only way to get access to these newer films, and the millions of names in them, would be to file a New York State Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request with the DOH. And judging from the DOH's terrible behavior concerning FOIL and historical records access, it is likely that they would ignore such a FOIL request, or try to deny it on ridiculous terms, perhaps inventing "creative" new FOIL exemptions, or claiming that their internal policies or rules could somehow trump the state law. And therefore, this request would most likely have to turn into a real Freedom of Information lawsuit -- which is more accurately an "Article 78" petition filed in the Supreme Court of New York. And we're perfectly happy to do that, if needed! Since our founding in 2015, Reclaim The Records has filed *nine* lawsuits against various city, state, and federal government agencies...well, so far. And other than the awesome Alex Krakovsky in Ukraine, we seem to be the only genealogists in the world who actually fight for genealogical records access in court. And we're pretty good at it. ;-) But the thing is, Reclaim The Records is *already* suing the NYC DOH in a different Freedom of Information suit right now, fighting for the first-ever public release of all New York City death certificates for 1949-1968. And we're also attempting to strike down their awful new rules against access to NYC birth and death certificates. You can read more about that ongoing case here: https://www.reclaimtherecords.org/records-request/24/ (FYI, the first hearing is coming up this Thursday!) So if you'd like to help fund *another* lawsuit to sue the NYC DOH under FOIL, to get the other forty years of the New York Geographical Birth Index out of the hands of the DOH and onto the Internet where it belongs, we would be happy to help. And it's certainly something that we might chose to do in the future. But the reality is that these lawsuits cost money, and we're a small non-profit, with an all-volunteer board. So we need to pick and choose our battles, and schedule these lawsuits strategically...and also ask for donations, to help make these lawsuits a reality. To sum up: yes, of course we want to get the rest of this great record set, and many other historical records too, and not just in New York -- but the only way to make that kind of thing happen is to raise more funding to hire lawyers, or else find more attorneys who are willing to work with us pro bono. The good news is that the law is quite often on our side, and that these suits can work really well. The bad news is that we have to pace ourselves and can only file and manage a few suits a year, so that our ambitions don't outstrip our bank account. ;-) - Brooke Schreier Ganz Mill Valley, California
|
|
A. E. Jordan
Brooke Schreier Ganz writes There are many other films of this Geographic Birth Index, which I have had some experience with these files at the Health Department. As part of a search a few years ago I asked for access to these files or the ability to check for a missing birth record. It was a long drawn out process with the Health Department constantly asking me if I was the father of the child born in 1910 who died in 1912. I got a certified copy of the death certificate from the Archives and using the DOH own rules I should have been permitted access to the birth record which was critical for the research.
After convincing DOH that it was mathematically (and biologically) impossible for me to be the father of a child who died 100-plus years ago one of the supervisors worked on my search.
When I raised the question of the geographic birth index to help solve the problem they admitted it exists on microfilm but later came back to me saying it was not possible that the records were "molding away" in their sub basement.
It would be great for Reclaim to win with the DOH but I fear what they may find.
Allan Jordan
|
|